There seems to be an increasingly
thirsty trend by the media of holding people to account. Is this a positive or
a negative trend? Is it conducive to better governance to find a scapegoat and
should it always be right to have someone to blame? Then having fingered the culprit the
individual is therefore expected to resign and if not the cry from the baying
journalists goes up - Sack
him ..... Fire her.....
My experience of life, happiness
and success is to suggest that the balance of commonsense and ultimately
behaviour has shifted to satisfy the media’s thirst for news.
Surely the happiest and most
successful organisations in both private and public sectors are run by leaders;
and true leaders practice the principle that “the buck stops here”. Real leaders take responsibility for the
failings of their followers; therefore the clamour for resignation or sacking
surely can lead to the demise of the leader that most people have chosen to
work for.
Working in an environment of a
blame culture, is not only sheer misery, but in the long term creates a no-decision,
no-creativeness, no-ownership, no-responsibility and a no-action environment.
Summed up as - nobody does anything that could possibly lead to a mistake.
Most of us who have been
fortunate enough to achieve ‘success’ got there by making
mistakes.
So when should somebody resign or
be fired while in a position of leadership?
.jpg)

No comments:
Post a Comment