Army 2020…
The defence secretary Philip Hammond has announced details of how the
Army will be restructured as it loses a fifth of its personnel over the
next few years. Seventeen units are to axed as part of sweeping reforms
that will reduce its overall strength by 20,000. Apparently, the cuts
will require at least two more tranches of redundancies next year and as
well in 2014 meaning that soldiers will hear about their own future at
the same time as British forces are pulling out of Afghanistan. Anyone
who has ever worked for a company that is going through a restructure
will know the impact not only on morale but also on efficacy. How our
forces are supposed to remain positive and effective units with this
Sword of Damocles over their heads is beyond me…Graciously, Hammond
acknowledges that morale in the army was "
fragile". "
People never like change…change brings uncertainty," he said as he palmed the issue off to the Ministry of Defence to explain to its staff.
I am intrigued therefore to understand the real thinking behind this
and how such a plan can be justified. Sure, I have no doubt it looks
good on the bean-counters spreadsheet and all the back-patting must be
causing a degree of bruising under those grey Whitehall wool suits, but
the reality from a purely common sense point of view, must be that this
is insanity. A reduced defence force dependant on part-timers and
foreign partners…
.
‘Uncertainty’, the name of the game…
If we are to believe the media, we are in the midst of a double-dip
recession, the construction industry is under-performing as a result of
tight lending and the rest of mainland Europe seems on the brink of
collapse. ‘Uncertainty’ is the name of the game right now…Despite a
slight fall in the unemployment rate in the last quarter, we still sit
at 2.61 million people unemployed just short of the 2.98 million we saw
ten years ago in 1992. Despite unemployment numbers being a somewhat
inexact science due to lag and timing, the reality is we have a huge
number of people, a large proportion of whom are 16-24 year olds,
claiming the dole and other welfare services. They are disillusioned,
disenfranchised and feel for the most part helpless. There is no
question that the gap between the ‘haves’ and ‘have not’s’ is greater
than it’s ever been in Britain and this was confirmed in the findings of
The Riots, Communities and Victims Panel, set up after the riots of
2011.
Reckless…
It is against this background that I challenge the sanity of a
decision that will over the next few years put so many valuable people
into harms way. I use the word ‘harm’, because it is appropriate. It is
perhaps not known or appreciated, that when a member of the service is
discharged or made redundant, they are in effect homeless and
jobless…either is a challenge at the best of times…but to be made both
by an institution that has cared for you by providing every need and
instruction, seems reckless and cruel given the service and loyalty our
military personnel deliver.
No room at the inn..
In speaking with many of the agencies tasked with resettlement of
military personnel, they all share the same issue i.e. the real
challenge of trying to place ex-service members into full time
employment. There is no question that our service colleagues are highly
trained and have a myriad of different skills, sadly for the most part
however, employers and HR professionals do not always have the time to
try and find out how those skills may be of benefit to their businesses.
How they could deploy these skills and with a small investment in
re-training, acquire an asset that can add hugely to their bottom line.
Franchise that..
I have been involved in advising, working with and speaking to in
excess of 50 major franchise companies over the years, I have discovered
that some of the most successful franchisees are ex-service people and
in endeavouring to discover a logical reason ‘why’, it becomes blatantly
obvious. For a franchisee to make a franchise work successfully and
very profitably they should follow the franchisor’s plan exactly to the
letter. So, who are the best-trained people in the UK to do what they
are told to do?
The challenge…
I have also been fortunate over the years in working with and
speaking to, dare I say, hundreds of thousands of people and in the
process have met thousands of ex-military. Consistently it has become
apparent how they are valued for the significant contributions they have
made to the organisations that they work with, often they are some of
the very best employees and I mean at all levels of employment.
There is a challenge though and it is one that must be addressed in
advance of discharge and then continued during the initial period as a
civilian. Military personnel exist in a tight structured environment.
Many of the simple things we think about such as shopping for food,
managing our finances, maintaining a roof over our heads, preparing a
CV, applying for jobs, things one might describe as ‘Life Skills’ are
not part of their thought process; they haven’t needed to be. It is
critical then that apart from retooling people’s skills, they are
supported in the more fundamental and mundane aspects of civilian life.
By default, being in the services requires you to be flexible and react
to changing situations, this may be easy in theatre…but their skills
must now be redirected and adapted for ‘Civvy Street’. If they are not
appropriately supported and re-trained, we run the risk of merely adding
to the general unemployment frustrations mentioned above. Young people
dream from an early age of joining the Forces and to have that dream
ended because of ‘cuts’, is not something that can easily be
contemplated or accepted. By the same token, individuals that have
provided years of loyal service both in peace and in war will have an
extremely hard time accepting these upcoming redundancies and the
slashing of historical traditions.
Why? ...
The point is simple enough; are we just cutting the military because
it looks good on paper? Has Whitehall considered that unless properly
supported, we will only be adding to the layers of unemployed and so any
savings are merely redirected to a different budget line? How much
support are UK employers willing to take to ensure that we can find jobs
for these people? How are the government encouraging and incentivising
employers to take on ex-military staff? However you carve it up, we will
ultimately be responsible for paying the bill. So with that in mind,
let us be proactive in finding opportunities to hire ex-forces personnel
and not allow them to become a nameless statistic on a graph.
Be creative…
In an ideal world, there would be 0% unemployment, many corporations
talk about people being their greatest asset. As a nation, we should be
thinking the same thing and taking collective responsibility for the
less fortunate and unemployed. Our military are the unwilling victims of
some spreadsheet madness. They need protecting. Too much of our
employment mentality is directed towards skills and past experience so
may I say to UK employers, BIG, BIG mistake. Think outside the box when
you are recruiting, don’t just tick boxes because it’s the easiest thing
to do, go for attitude because the skills are easy to train and you
will always get a positive experience on the back of good training.
The opportunity…
There is a reason why our British Armed Services attract the
admiration of the rest of the world. Our core military values are
courage, discipline, respect, integrity, loyalty and selflessness. Why
would we not want to harness those traits to help grow our businesses?